Monday, September 17, 2012

The Bourne Legacy (2012) Review


I remember back in the day when I first saw The Bourne Identity, and it was one of the most suspenseful and thrilling films I had ever seen. For each subsequent Bourne film, I had the same feeling of pure adrenaline; this film however, lacks the feeling the original trilogy gave me. The fourth instalment in Bourne franchise is written and directed by Tony Gilroy (who also wrote the first three films) and gets rid of Jason Bourne altogether… sort of.

The film follow Aaron Cross (Jeremy Renner), who is an agent in a similar program to the one Jason Bourne was in. As these government programs are slowly endangered of getting exposed, they decide to shut down the program and erase all evidence of the programs, which involves wiping out all agents. Aaron Cross, however, managed to dodge their first attempt to kill him and is now on the run from the government.  The premise is intriguing, but sadly the script lacks questions to drive the film. The are occasional questions that pop up during the film, however most of these are minor and often answered too quickly and not very cleverly. This leaves us with only one question, whether he lives or dies, driving the film´s suspense. A simple plot like this can work well if done right, however when a film is so much dialogue and so little action, there should be much more going on in the story. While Jason Bourne was a character full of mystery and depth, Aaron Cross is very bland, one-dimensional and just not very interesting. That being said, Renner gives an undeniably good performance, but it is still hard to root for this guy because there just aren’t that many reasons for us to care for him. The only reason we really cheer for him is because the people who are trying to get him killed are unquestionably some pretty bad people. The main antagonist of the film is Eric Byer (Edward Norton) who is set up as a good villain, however as the film moves along he just kind of disappears and seems to be forgotten by the end of the film and overall he was just underused. As for Jason Bourne being here, well he doesn’t physically appear, but he is mentioned quite a lot, which actually bothered me a lot as I felt it didn’t matter for the film I was watching, the scenes didn’t add anything to the story. It kind of felt like they wanted to remind us that this is in the Jason Bourne universe, but it just felt like they were trying to tell a story about Jason Bourne without Jason Bourne.

The films strongpoint is its actions scenes, which are all very well done and for the most part they hold up to the action scenes in the original trilogy in terms of execution. The film doesn´t use as much shaky cam as the previous film, however thats a good think as its easier to follow the action scenes here. One thing that somewhat at times removed some suspense from the action scenes, is that Aaron Cross seemed pretty much indestructible, he was a complete badass, but he just didn’t seem to have any weak spots or vulnerability. The cinematography was very good for the most part with some beautiful scenic shot, however there were some occasional odd camerawork during dialogue scenes that, to me, were somewhat distracting, however this only happened a couple of times. The film had sine very choppy editing in th4 first ten minutes or so, however it got better after that. The film actually does have some balls though, because there is one scene here, which was maybe the best of the film that takes place in a lab (not going to spoil anything more then that), which I think is a bold scene for a film like this and was very unexpectedly unsettling.

Overall this film is nowhere close to the original trilogy and has one too many flaws to make it a great movie, however it still is very enjoyable if you are looking for a fun action-thriller to watch with your friends, just don’t expect the complexity found within the previous instalments.

2.5/5 

No comments:

Post a Comment