Thursday, May 9, 2013

Star Trek Into Darknes (2013) Review


This has to be the best Star Wars film sinc- what´s that? This is Star Trek? That odd TV show with those strange alien creatures that is on TV sometimes? Oh…
The first film in the new Star Trek universe took many by surprise back in 2009 and four years later we finally get a sequel before Abrams moves on to make Star Wars: Episode VII. Despite not being a trekkie at all, I have to admit I had very high expectations for this film. The trailer looked like the film was exactly what I was hoping for in this sequel.

My introduction here was not just for sake of failed humour, but also to emphasize how much the film reminded me of the original Star Wars films. That being said I have to admit I am not a huge fan of Star wars in general, that does of course not mean that I don´t enjoy them. Luckily this film captured everything that I enjoy about Star Wars, while emitting most of what I don’t like.

The film starts off by reintroducing us to the characters in a thrillingly adventurous opening sequence. The sequence perfectly sets the tone for the rest of the film, one that is emotional, funny and adventurous.


From it´s opening shot the film is gorgeous. It doesn´t take long to see that this is an Abrams film; his style is splattered all over the film. The lens flare is of course the most obvious one, but while there is a lot of it, I didn´t find it nearly as distracting as I usually do. However, what there is also lots of here that I love with Abrams is those beautiful shots where he has one smaller object like a person and a much larger object, where he films the large object as if it were the smaller object, greatly emphasizing the scale.

The CGI is some of the best I have seen in a while, putting Iron Man 3 to shame and making Oblivion´s visuals not all that impressive after all. I said in my Iron Man 3 review that there was a sequence in the film that few films would be able to match this year, but well I guess I was wrong. There is at least one sequence here that is on par with the one I mentioned there, which is a testament to how great the CGI is, as the one in Iron Man 3 was done with quite a lot of practical effects. The ones that come to mind from this film were most definitely CGI, yet it was so well executed that it just felt amazing.

If there is one thing that could have been better it is the script. The story was arguably weak, yet it was enough to drive the film forward without doing anything extraordinary in its own right. I also thought it had some weird plot development in the first act, rushing through, a lot, while the second and third act felt like a TV episode. Saying it felt like a TV episode is actually a compliment, considering the film is over two hours long yet it went by at the blink of an eye.

The acting is for the most part very good, though some of the supporting cast in the minor roles could have been better. The three standouts are Simon Pegg, Zachary Quinto and of Benedict Cumerbatch who is amazing in his first big Hollywood role. I would not be surprised if, when looking back at 2013, his portrayal of John Harrison will be remembered as the best villain of the year.

The film does have some flaws here and there and it may not go boldly where none has gone before, but it is one of the most fun theatre experiences I have had in quite some time. It doesn´t have the strongest plot, but it is one of the most fun cinema experiences in recent memory, beating out any of the Marvel films, as well as many other recent summer blockbusters. It is safe to say that summer has finally arrived!

4.5/5


 

No comments:

Post a Comment